Independent recommendations
We don't resell or push preferred vendors. Every suggestion is based on what fits your architecture and constraints.
Decompose your monolith into cloud-native microservices on Kubernetes. Strangler fig pattern, domain-driven design, and phased delivery without big-bang rewrites.
Monolithic architectures become bottlenecks as organizations grow. Every change requires a full deployment. Teams step on each other's code. Scaling means scaling everything, even the parts that don't need it. The solution isn't a risky big-bang rewrite—it's incremental decomposition using the strangler fig pattern.
Our team has decomposed 30+ monoliths into cloud-native microservices on Kubernetes. We use domain-driven design to identify service boundaries, implement API gateways for traffic routing, and deploy each new microservice to EKS, AKS, or GKE while the monolith continues running.
The result: independent team velocity, service-level scaling, faster deployments, and a modern architecture—delivered incrementally with zero production downtime.
What changes when you decompose your monolith
Organizations that decompose monoliths into microservices achieve dramatic improvements in deployment velocity, team autonomy, and system resilience.
End-to-end monolith-to-microservices transformation
Analyze your monolith's domain model to identify bounded contexts and service boundaries. We use domain-driven design principles to define microservices that align with business capabilities, ensuring each service has clear ownership and minimal coupling.
Incrementally extract microservices from your monolith using the strangler fig pattern. We route traffic between the monolith and new services via an API gateway, allowing gradual migration without rewriting everything at once.
Implement API gateways and service mesh for secure, observable microservices communication. We deploy Istio or Linkerd for traffic management, mutual TLS, and distributed tracing across your Kubernetes environment.
Split shared databases into per-service data stores and implement event-driven communication patterns. We use message brokers (Kafka, RabbitMQ, NATS) and the saga pattern for distributed transactions across microservices.
Proven patterns for successful decomposition
Incrementally replace monolith functionality by routing traffic to new microservices via an API gateway.
Each microservice owns its data store, eliminating shared database coupling and enabling independent scaling.
Asynchronous messaging via Kafka or NATS for loose coupling between services.
Centralized entry point for routing, authentication, rate limiting, and traffic splitting between monolith and services.
Prevent cascading failures with circuit breakers, retries, and bulkhead isolation between services.
Manage distributed transactions across microservices with compensating actions for consistency.
Incremental transformation without big-bang risk
Conduct domain-driven design workshops with your team to identify bounded contexts, define service boundaries, and map data ownership. Produce a decomposition roadmap prioritized by business value and coupling.
Deploy an API gateway in front of the monolith and extract the first microservice. Route traffic between monolith and new service. This validates the architecture and builds team confidence.
Extract services one by one following the strangler fig pattern. Each service gets its own database, CI/CD pipeline, and Kubernetes deployment. The monolith shrinks with each iteration.
After all critical services are extracted, retire the remaining monolith. Implement service mesh for observability and set up platform engineering practices for long-term operations.
Proven microservices transformation experience
Track record across Java, .NET, Python, and Node.js monoliths
Strangler fig pattern delivers value incrementally without production risk
Domain-driven design workshops ensure service boundaries align with business
Kubernetes, CI/CD, observability, and service mesh—everything your microservices need
We're not a typical consultancy. Here's why that matters.
We don't resell or push preferred vendors. Every suggestion is based on what fits your architecture and constraints.
No commissions, no referral incentives, no behind-the-scenes partnerships. We stay neutral so you get the best option — not the one that pays.
All engagements are led by senior engineers, not sales reps. Conversations are technical, pragmatic, and honest.
We help you pick tech that is reliable, scalable, and cost-efficient — not whatever is hyped or expensive.
We design solutions based on your business context, your team, and your constraints — not generic slide decks.
What our customers say about our decomposition services
"Their team helped us improve how we develop and release our software. Automated processes made our releases faster and more dependable. Tasrie modernized our IT setup, making it flexible and cost-effective. The long-term benefits far outweighed the initial challenges. Thanks to Tasrie IT Services, we provide better youth sports programs to our NYC community."
"Tasrie IT Services successfully restored and migrated our servers to prevent ransomware attacks. Their team was responsive and timely throughout the engagement."
"Tasrie IT has been an incredible partner in transforming our investment management. Their Kubernetes scalability and automated CI/CD pipeline revolutionized our trading bot performance. Faster releases, better decisions, and more innovation."
"Their team deeply understood our industry and integrated seamlessly with our internal teams. Excellent communication, proactive problem-solving, and consistently on-time delivery."
"The changes Tasrie made had major benefits. Fewer outages, faster updates, and improved customer experience. Plus we saved a good amount on costs."
Common questions about monolith decomposition
Almost always decompose incrementally. Full rewrites are high-risk, expensive, and often fail. The strangler fig pattern lets you extract microservices one at a time while the monolith continues running. Each extracted service delivers value immediately without waiting for a complete rewrite. Our DevOps consulting team implements this pattern with CI/CD automation.
We prioritize based on business value, change frequency, and coupling. Components that change often, have distinct business domains, or cause deployment bottlenecks are extracted first. We use domain-driven design workshops with your team to map bounded contexts and define service boundaries that align with team structure.
Shared databases are the hardest part of decomposition. We follow a phased approach: first, introduce a data access layer in the monolith. Then, split tables by service ownership using the database-per-service pattern. For cross-service queries, we implement event-driven data replication or CQRS patterns. Data consistency is maintained via sagas and eventual consistency.
It depends on the monolith's size and complexity. Extracting 2-3 initial services typically takes 2-4 months. A full decomposition of a large monolith into 10-20 microservices may span 6-18 months with phased delivery. Each phase delivers working microservices in production. Contact us for a detailed assessment.
We're stack-agnostic and work with your team's preferred languages. Common patterns include Spring Boot (Java), .NET, Go, Node.js, and Python with containerized deployments. For infrastructure, we use Terraform for provisioning, Helm for packaging, ArgoCD for GitOps, and Istio or Linkerd for service mesh.
Get a free architecture assessment. We'll analyze your monolith, identify service boundaries, and provide a decomposition roadmap with timelines and effort estimates.
"We build relationships, not just technology."
Faster delivery
Reduce lead time and increase deploy frequency.
Reliability
Improve change success rate and MTTR.
Cost control
Kubernetes/GitOps patterns that scale efficiently.
No sales spam—just a short conversation to see if we can help.
Thanks! We'll be in touch shortly.